My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in TPG

  1. Vol. 2 No. 1, p. 11-22
    OPEN ACCESS
     
    Received: Sept 4, 2008
    Published: Mar, 2009


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.3835/plantgenome2008.09.0006

Marker Imputation in Barley Association Studies

  1. Jean-Luc Jannink ,
  2. Hiroyoshi Iwata,
  3. Prasanna R. Bhat,
  4. Shiaoman Chao,
  5. Peter Wenzl and
  6. Gary J. Muehlbauer
  1. J.-L. Jannink, USDA-ARS, R.W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14850; H. Iwata, National Agricultural Research Center, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8666, Japan; S. Chao, USDA-ARS, Biosciences Research Lab., 1605 Albrecht Blvd., Fargo, ND 58105-5674; P.R. Bhat, Dep. of Botany and Plant Sciences, Univ. of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521; P. Wenzl, Triticarte P/L, P.O. Box 7141, Yarralumla (Canberra), ACT 2600, Australia; G.J. Muehlbauer, Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Abstract

Association mapping requires high marker density, potentially leading to many missing marker data and to high genotyping costs. In human genetics, methods exist to impute missing marker data and whole markers typed in a reference panel but not in the experimental dataset. We sought to determine if an imputation method developed for human data would function effectively in a barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) panel. The panel contained 98 lines, 2517 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, and 716 Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) markers. Averaged over markers, masked scores were correctly imputed 97.1% of the time. We chose 610 and 273 tag markers in two- and six-row barley subpopulations, respectively. Despite this low number of tags, imputation accuracy was such that for about 80% of non-tag markers, the prediction r2 between imputed and true scores was 0.8 or higher. When DArT markers were used as tags, SNP markers were imputed with similar accuracy, suggesting that the method can convert association information from one marker system (e.g., DArT) to another marker system (e.g., SNP). We believe marker imputation methods will have an important future in association studies as a component of tagging methods and in reducing problems due to missing data.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. Copyright © 2009 Crop Science Society of America