My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 69 No. 1, p. 215-226
     
    Received: May 22, 2003
    Published: Jan, 2005


    * Corresponding author(s): csiegel@vt.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0215

Seedling Root Growth as a Function of Soil Density and Water Content

  1. C. M. Siegel-Issem *a,
  2. J. A. Burgera,
  3. R. F. Powersb,
  4. F. Ponderc and
  5. S. C. Pattersond
  1. a Dep. of Forestry (0324), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
    b USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave, Redding, CA 96001
    c USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Lincoln University, Foster Hall, Room 208, Jefferson City, MO 65102
    d MeadWestvaco Corp., Forest Science Lab, Box WV, 180 Westvaco Rd. Summerville, SC 29483

Abstract

Compaction caused by some intensive forest management practices can reduce tree growth, but growth reduction is the result of complex interactions between soil properties and tree physiological processes, which may differ by species. We used a 7 by 7 factorial greenhouse experiment to create a matrix of bulk density (ρb) and volumetric water content (θv) to better understand soil compaction effects on seedling growth of: (i) ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws) grown on Dome and Cohasset soils; (ii) shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) on a Clarksville soil; and (iii) loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on an Argent soil. Models of root length density (RLD) were developed using multiple regression. The general model of RLD = b0 + b1 θ v + b2 ρ b + b3θ v 2 described rooting response for the Clarksville-shortleaf and Argent-loblolly soil–species combinations (p = 0.005). However, the ponderosa pine RLD response on Cohasset soil was linear and there was an interaction between θv and ρb in the Dome soil. Shoot mass of seedlings growing within the least limiting water range (LLWR) was greater than those growing outside the range for all soil–species combinations except the Argent-loblolly pine (p = 0.05). The loblolly pines had greater shoot mass at θv above the upper LLWR limits (aeration limiting). Least limiting water range has potential as a soil quality indicator, but seedling response was not always associated with LLWR. Root length density (RLD) response surface models in conjunction with seasonal site water data have potential for determining compaction-induced soil limitations for tree growth, but need to be field tested and calibrated for both soil and species.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2005. Soil Science SocietySoil Science Society of America