My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 68 No. 6, p. 2042-2047
     
    Received: Sept 2, 2003
    Published: Nov, 2004


    * Corresponding author(s): mueller@uky.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.2042

Map Quality for Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation

  1. T. G. Mueller *a,
  2. N. B. Pusuluria,
  3. K. K. Mathiasa,
  4. P. L. Corneliusa,
  5. R. I. Barnhisela and
  6. S. A. Shearerb
  1. a University of Kentucky, Dep. of Agronomy, N-122 Ag. Science North, Lexington, KY 40502
    b Dep. of Biosyst. and Agric. Eng., University of Kentucky, 218 C.E. Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40546-0276

Abstract

The selection of a spatial interpolation methods will impact the quality of site-specific soil fertility maps. The objective of this study was to describe and predict the relative performance of inverse distance weighted (IDW) and ordinary kriging. Soil samples were collected on 30.5-m grids for fields in five Kentucky counties and analyzed for pH, buffer pH, P, K, Ca, and Mg. From these data sets, 61-m grid subsets were extracted. Data were interpolated with IDW and kriging procedures. Prediction efficiency (PE) was determined using an independent dataset (PEvalidation) and with cross-validation (PEcross-validation). Multiple stepwise regression was used to develop models that described the relative performance of ordinary kriging and IDW with statistical properties of the data. At the 30.5-m grid scale, the performance of ordinary kriging relative to IDW improved as the range of spatial correlation increased and fit of the semivariogram model improved. However, at the 61.0-m grid scale, the performance of ordinary kriging relative to IDW diminished as the degree of spatial structure increased and the fit of the semivariogram model improved. Alone, PEcross-validation poorly describes the performance of PEvalidation across locations, soil properties, and sampling intervals (r 2 = 0.18). However, in combination with the range of spatial correlation, substantial variability at the 30.5-m grid scale was described for variables with sample semivariograms that reached plateaus (R 2 = 0.61). In some situations, better decisions will be made regarding the use of these methods by considering the range of spatial correlation and cross-validation statistics.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. Soil Science SocietySoil Science Society of America