My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 68 No. 4, p. 1342-1351
     
    Received: Feb 4, 2003
    Published: July, 2004


    * Corresponding author(s): wilts@morris.ars.usda.gov
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1342

Long-Term Corn Residue Effects

  1. A. R. Wilts *a,
  2. D. C. Reicoskya,
  3. R. R. Allmarasb and
  4. C. E. Clappc
  1. a USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab, 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267
    b USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research, St. Paul, MN 55108
    c USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

A better understanding of C turnover, with estimates of root-derived C, is needed to manage soil C sequestration. The objective was to evaluate the long-term treatment and environmental effects on unharvestable soil C components. Two N fertilizer treatments and a control were imposed during 29 yr of continuous corn (Zea mays L.) with stover removal as silage vs. stover return during grain harvest with moldboard plow (MB) tillage. Soil organic carbon (SOC) declined and natural 13C abundance (δ13C) increased during the 29-yr period. Field averages of SOC and δ13C (0–30 cm) were 96.4 Mg ha−1 and −17.3‰ in 1965; respective values in 1995 were 78.9 Mg ha−1 and −16.6‰. Loss of SOC was greater with stover removed or no fertilization, but δ13C increased for all treatments. Stover yield (SY), SOC, and δ13C data were applied to a model to estimate unharvestable C and predict total source C (SC) input from corn. The SC for 29 yr totaled 172 to 189 Mg ha−1 when stover was harvested and 268 to 284 Mg ha−1 when stover was returned. The SC input from unharvestable sources was 1.8 times more than SC from aboveground stover when N was added and 1.7 when N was not added. The root-to-shoot ratio was 1.1 when N was added and 1.2 with no N. Only 5.3% of the SC was retained as SOC. Unharvestable C contributions to rhizodeposition are much larger than suggested from controlled studies including C-enriched CO2 followed by soil respiration or CO2 efflux measurements.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. Soil Science SocietySoil Science Society of America