My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 61 No. 2, p. 626-631
     
    Received: Feb 22, 1994
    Published: Mar, 1997


    * Corresponding author(s): ellessm@aol.com
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020036x

Concentration of Uranium Particulates from Soils Using a Novel Density-Separation Technique

  1. M. P. Elless ,
  2. M. E. Timpson and
  3. S. Y. Lee
  1. Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
    Quaternary Studies Program, Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Abstract

Abstract

Soils contaminated with heavy metals or radionuclides at concentrations above regulatory limits pose an environmental and human health risk. Whereas regulatory limits are only concerned with the “extent” of the contamination, knowledge of the “nature” of the contamination (e.g., oxidation state and mineralogy of the contaminant, particulate vs. adsorbed form, etc.) is necessary for developing optimal treatment strategies. Mineralogical identification of the contaminants provides important information concerning the nature of the contamination because once the mineral form is known, its properties can then be determined from geochemical data. To this end, a new density-fractionation technique called the Magstream density separator was used to concentrate U particulates from U-contaminated soils at a former U.S. Department of Energy U-metal production facility. Results from neutron-activation analysis of each density fraction showed that the U had been concentrated (up to 11-fold) in the heavier fractions. Mineralogical analyses of the density fractions of these soils using x-ray diffraction, scanning-electron microscopy, and an electron microprobe showed the predominance of an autunite [Ca(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 10–12 H2O]-like mineral with lesser amounts of uraninite (UO2) and coffinite (USiO4) as the U-bearing minerals in these soils. The presence of reduced forms of U in these soils suggests that the optimal remediation strategy requires treatment with an oxidizing agent in addition to a carbonate-based leachant to solubilize and remove U from these soils.

Contribution of Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America

Facebook   Twitter