My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 59 No. 5, p. 1403-1412
     
    Received: May 4, 1994
    Published: Sept, 1995


    * Corresponding author(s): gabriele@bcgn.inra.grignon.fr
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900050029x

Analysis and Field Evaluation of the Ceres Models Water Balance Component

  1. Benoît Gabrielle ,
  2. Safya Menasseri and
  3. Sabine Houot
  1. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Bioclimatologie, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
    Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire des Sols, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France

Abstract

Abstract

The soil water status partly determines the N losses from soilcrop systems. With the ultimate objective of estimating N losses, the capacity-based water balance module of the Ceres models was tested against field data collected from various pedoclimatic regimes in France. A process-oriented analysis of initial simulation results for a loamy soil prompted introduction of Darcy's law in the drainage and capillary rise parts of the model. As a result, a more accurate prediction of the soil water storage and surface water content was achieved. This was confirmed by comparing model output against independent data from bare or maize (Zea mays L.)-cropped conditions and for silt loam or sandy loam soils. For a 1-yr period, the mean square error between modeled and measured water storages was in the range 1.9 to 3 cm2 water for the modified model, in contrast with 4 to 12 cm2 using the original model (which performed best on well-drained soils). A unidimensional sensitivity analysis was conducted with regard to the three new parameters introduced in the revised model: the saturated hydraulic conductivity and two texture-dependent constants used in simple analytical representations of the moisture retention and hydraulic conductivity curves. The sensitivity analysis proved that this more physical approach in capacity-based models required less rigorous parameterization than mechanistic models. Moreover, the accuracy of the simulations performed with the modified model fell within the experimental error in the measurements.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America