My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 57 No. 2, p. 490-497
     
    Received: Apr 5, 1991
    Published: Mar, 1993


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020032x

Flood Irrigation of a Cracked Soil

  1. Alan R. Mitchell  and
  2. M. Th. van Genuchten
  1. Oregon State Univ., Central Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 850 NW Dogwood Lane, Madras, OR 97741
    USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab., 4500 Glenwood Dr., Riverside, CA 92501

Abstract

Abstract

An understanding of water flow into cracking, irrigated soils is necessary in order to address problems of plant water stress, inefficient water application, lack of aeration, and salt accumulation in the soil due to inadequate leaching. The objectives of this study were to investigate water infiltration into a cracked clay soil during flood irrigation, and to observe the differences in infiltration and cracking patterns between fallow soil following wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ‘Yecoro Rojo’) and soil under alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. ‘CUF 101’). A large weighing lysimeter was used to measure infiltration and evaporation. The infiltration was analyzed as consisting of three phases of crack filling, sorption, and transmission. The infiltration curves were found to be similar for all irrigations, with a larger percentage of the total infiltrated water initially entering the cracks of the drier alfalfa soil (74%) than the wheat-cropped soil (63%). Final infiltration rates were 0.4 and 0.6 mm h-1 for the alfalfa and wheat irrigations, respectively. Evaporation was shown to be a large component of water loss during the later stages of irrigation, sometimes exceeding the infiltration rate. Cracking patterns could be observed because of the presence of foam, which consists of organic acids picked up by water rising in the cracks. The wheat-cropped fallow soil had more numerous cracks than alfalfa-cropped soil, which was attributed to its fiberous root system, which is weaker than the alfalfa taproot system. The difference in cracking patterns between the two crops has implications for water flow.

Contribution of the USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America