My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 35 No. 1, p. 105-107
     
    Received: Mar 9, 1970
    Published: Jan, 1971


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500010031x

A Comparison of Analytical Methods for Soil Zine1

  1. A. L. Brown,
  2. James Quick and
  3. J. L. Eddings2

Abstract

Abstract

Soils from 92 fields in California were analyzed for extractable Zn by four methods, namely, ammonium acetate-diphenyl-thiocarbazone (dithizone), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), 0.1N HCl, and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (Na2EDTA). Each soil was tested in the greenhouse for plant response in relation to Zn applications. All four methods exhibited a high degree of correlation with each other; the highest correlation coefficient was obtained for the comparison of dithizone with DTPA.

Calculated predictive values for DTPA, dithizone, 0.1N HCl, and Na2EDTA were 83, 79, 73, and 72%, respectively, for the 92 soils studied. On this basis the DTPA is preferable to the others and the critical level is approximately 0.5 ppm Zn. For some soils, more than one method may be required to properly characterize the Zn status. The choice of method will depend upon the correlation with plant response, equipment and facilities available, and to some extent on the preference of the analyst.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America