My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 8 No. 1, p. 69-71
     
    Received: Jan 26, 1978
    Published: Jan, 1979


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800010015x

Influence of Simulated Rainfall on the Retention of Sludge Heavy Metals by the Leaves of Forage Crops1

  1. S. G. Jones,
  2. K. W. Brown,
  3. L. E. Deuel and
  4. K. C. Donnelly2

Abstract

Abstract

The land disposal of municipal liquid digested sludge by surface application to a growing forage crop may cause foliage to become coated with sludge. The ingestion of foliage contaminated with sludge could be detrimental to the health of grazing animals, since municipal sludges often contain potentially toxic amounts of various heavy metals. The influence of simulated rainfall, leaf morphology, and sludge solids concentration on the retention of sludge heavy metals by the foliage of grasses was evaluated.

Liquid digested sludges, containing 2 and 4% solids, were applied to greenhouse flats of common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) and Bell rhodesgrass (Chloris gayana Kunth.), equivalent to depths of 2.50 and 1.25 cm, respectively. Sludge-treated grasses were subjected to simulated rainfall equivalent to 2.5 cm/hour either immediately following sludge treatments or after 24 hours of drying. Additional flats receiving the sludge treatments were sampled at regular intervals over a 2-week period to determine the foliar retention of sludge in the absence of rainfall.

The foliage of both grasses was visibly contaminated with sludge following application. The foliar concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn were measured for each sludge treatment. There appeared to be no preferential retention of any particular heavy metal. Bell rhodesgrass retained more sludge than common bermudagrass because of its larger leaf blades and overlapping sheathes. The sludge containing 4% solids was retained by the foliage to a greater extent than sludge containing 2% solids.

Sludge that was not allowed to dry on the leaves was removed by 1.25 cm of simulated rainfall, regardless of the grass species or sludge solids concentration. Sludge that was allowed to dry on the leaves, however, was not removed by 2.50 cm of simualted rainfall.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .