My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 41 No. 4, p. 1301-1314
     
    Received: Oct 25, 2011
    Published: July, 2012


    * Corresponding author(s): David.Lapen@agr.gc.ca
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0407

Impact of Riparian Zone Protection from Cattle on Nutrient, Bacteria, F-coliphage, Cryptosporidium, and Giardia Loading of an Intermittent Stream

  1. M.D. Sunoharaa,
  2. E. Toppb,
  3. G. Wilkesa,
  4. N. Gottschalla,
  5. N. Neumannc,
  6. N. Rueckerd,
  7. T. H. Jonese,
  8. T.A. Edgef,
  9. R. Martib and
  10. D. R. Lapen* *a
  1. a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada
    b Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, ON, N5V 4T3, Canada
    c School of Public Health, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
    d City of Calgary, AB, T3E SH1, Canada
    e Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, T4L 1W1, Canada
    f Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, L7R 4A6, Canada. Assigned to Associate Editor Garey Fox

Abstract

This 5-yr study compared, via an upstream–downstream experimental design, nutrient and microbial water quality of an intermittent stream running through a small pasture (∼2.5 animals ha−1) where cattle are restricted from the riparian zone (restricted cattle access [RCA]) and where cattle have unrestricted access to the stream (unrestricted cattle access [URCA]). Fencing in the RCA excluded pasturing cattle to within ∼3 to 5 m of the stream. Approximately 88% (26/32) of all comparisons of mean contaminant load reduction for lower, higher, and all stream flow conditions during the 5-yr study indicated net contaminant load reductions in the RCA; for the URCA, this percentage was 38% (12/32). For all flow conditions, mean percent load reductions in the RCA for nutrients and bacteria plus F-coliphage were 24 and 23%, respectively. These respective percentages for the URCA were −9 and −57% (positive values are reductions; negative values are increases). However, potentially as a result of protected wildlife habitat in the RCA, the mean percent load reduction for Cryptosporidium for “all flow” was −321% for the RCA and 60% for the URCA; for Giardia, these respective percentages were −209% (RCA) and 73% (URCA). For “all flow” situations, mean load reductions for the RCA were significantly greater (p < 0.1) than those from the URCA for NH4+–N, dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total coliform, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus. For “high flow” situations, mean load reductions were significantly greater for the RCA for DRP, total coliform, and Enterococcus. For “low flow” conditions, significantly greater mean load reductions were in favor of the RCA for DRP, total P, total coliforms, fecal coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus. In no case were mean pollutant loads in the URCA significantly higher than RCA pollutant loads. Restricting pasturing livestock to within 3 to 5 m of intermittent streams can improve water quality; however, water quality impairment can occur if livestock have unrestricted access to a stream.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2012. Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.