My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 39 No. 1, p. 136-146
     
    Received: Feb 16, 2009
    Published: Jan, 2010


    * Corresponding author(s): malkasi@iastate.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0063

Soil Carbon Dynamics and Carbon Budget of Newly Reconstructed Tall-grass Prairies in South Central Iowa

  1. Jose G. Guzman and
  2. Mahdi M. Al-Kaisi *
  1. Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010

Abstract

In addition to their aesthetic and environmental qualities, reconstructed prairies can act as C sinks and potentially offset rising atmospheric CO2 concentration. The objective of this study was to quantify C budget components of newly established prairies on previously cultivated land. Net ecosystem production (NEP) was estimated using a C budgeting approach that assessed SOC content, soil surface CO2–C emission, and above- and belowground plant biomass. Study was conducted in southern Iowa, in 2005 to 2007. Results show that differences between sites for potential total C input were primarily due to root biomass contributions, which ranged from 0.8 to 5.4 Mg C ha−1 Average potential aboveground biomass C input was 2.7 Mg C ha−1 in 2006 and 5.5 Mg C ha−1 in 2007. Total soil CO2–C emissions from heterotrophic respiration increased as prairie age increased from 2.9 to 4.0 Mg C ha−1 and 3.1 to 4.7 Mg C ha−1 in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Determination of NEP showed that the 1998 and 2003 reconstructed prairie sites had the greatest potential for soil C sequestration at 4.1 and 4.4 Mg C ha−1 Increases in SOC content were only observed in the youngest established prairie site (2003) and the no-till site in 2003 at 2.1 and 2.6 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively. Declines of SOC sequestration rates occurred when potential C equilibrium was reached (Rh = NPP) within 10 yr since prairie establishment.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2010. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

Facebook   Twitter