My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 35 No. 4, p. 1396-1404
     
    Received: Apr 29, 2005
    Published: July, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): ecarlisle@ucdavis.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0155

Effects of Land Use on Soil Respiration

  1. Eli A. Carlisle *a,
  2. Kerri L. Steenwerthab and
  3. David R. Smarta
  1. a Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8749
    b present address: USDA/ARS, Crops Pathology and Genetics Unit, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8749

Abstract

We examined constraints on soil CO2 respiration in natural oak woodlands, and adjacent vineyards that were converted approximately 30 yr ago from oak woodlands, in the Oakville Region of Napa Valley, California. All sites were located on the same soil type, a Bale (variant) gravelly loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll) and dominated by C3 vegetation. Seasonal soil CO2 efflux was greatest at the oak woodland sites, although during the summer drought the rates of soil CO2 efflux measured from oak sites were generally similar to those measured from the vineyards. Soil profile CO2 concentrations at the oak woodland sites were lower below 15 cm despite higher CO2 efflux rates. Soil gas diffusion coefficients for oak sites were larger than for vineyard sites, and this indicated that the apparent discrepancy in soil profile carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) may be caused by a diffusion limitation. Soil profile [CO2] and δ13C values showed substantial temporal changes over the course of a year. Vineyard soil CO2 was more depleted in 13CO2 below 25 cm in the soil profile during the active growing season as indicated by more negative δ13C ratios. This result indicated that different C sources were being oxidized in vineyard soils. Annual C losses were less from vineyard soils (7.02 ± 0.58 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) as compared to oak soils (15.67 ± 1.44 Mg C ha−1 yr−1), and both were comparable to losses reported in previous investigations.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyASA, CSSA, SSSA