My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 33 No. 3, p. 873-881
     
    Received: Dec 4, 2002
    Published: May, 2004


    * Corresponding author(s): ken.barbarick@colostate.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0873

Plant and Soil Responses to Biosolids Application following Forest Fire

  1. V. F. Meyera,
  2. E. F. Redenteb,
  3. K. A. Barbarick *c,
  4. R. B. Brobstd,
  5. M. W. Paschkeb and
  6. A. L. Millerc
  1. a MFG, Inc., 3801 Automation Way, Ft. Collins, CO 80525
    b Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
    c Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
    d USEPA Region 8, Denver, CO 80202

Abstract

Soil stability and revegetation is a great concern following forest wildfires. Biosolids application might enhance revegetation efforts and enhance soil stability. In May 1997, we applied Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Denver, CO, USA) composted biosolids at rates of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 Mg ha−1 to a severely burned, previously forested site near Buffalo Creek, CO to improve soil C and N levels and help establish eight native, seeded grasses. The soils on the site belong to the Sphinx series (sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid, shallow Typic Ustorthents). Vegetation and soils data were collected for four years following treatment. During the four years following treatment, total plant biomass ranged from approximately 50 to 230 g m−2 and generally increased with increasing biosolids application. The percentage of bare ground ranged from 4 to 58% and generally decreased with increasing biosolids rate. Higher rates of biosolids application were associated with increased concentrations of N, P, and Zn in tissue of the dominant plant species, streambank wheatgrass [Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & J.G. Sm) Gould subsp. lanceolatus], relative to the unamended, unfertilized control. At two months following biosolids application (1997), total soil C and N at soil depths of 0 to 7.5, 7.5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm showed significant (P < 0.05) linear increases (r 2 > 0.88) as biosolids rate increased. The surface soil layer also showed this effect one year after application (1998). For Years 2 through 4 (1999–2001) following treatment, soil C and N levels declined but did not show consistent trends. The increase in productivity and cover resulting from the use of biosolids can aid in the rehabilitation of wildfire sites and reduce soil erosion in ecosystems similar to the Buffalo Creek area.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2004. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyASA, CSSA, SSSA