My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 3 No. 3, p. 223-228
     
    Received: June 22, 1973
    Published: July, 1974


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq1974.00472425000300030008x

Columns Representing Mound-Type Disposal Systems for Septic Tank Effluent: I. Soil-water and Gas Relations1

  1. F. R. Magdoff,
  2. J. Bouma and
  3. D. R. Keeney2

Abstract

Abstract

Columns were designed to represent the vertical dimensions of a mound-type disposal system for receiving septic tank effluent on problem soils. The columns were filled with gravel (representing creviced bedrock), silt loam (representing the original topsoil), a sand or sandy loam till (fill material), gravel (the seepage bed), and another layer of silt loam (the mound cover). The columns were dosed with septic tank effluent at the rate of 2 cm every 6 hours. Until crusting caused permanent ponding at the fill-gravel interface, the fill was aerobic and the silt loam at the bottom of the column was anaerobic. Redox potentials were higher in the fill (350 to 600 mV) than in the silt loam (200 to 410 mV). Moisture tension fluctuations after a 2 cm addition were greatest near the fill-gravel interface and decreased with depth in the column. After continuous ponding, tension fluctuations almost ceased, the subcrustal soil became anaerobic, and the redox potentials decreased to around −250 mV. In a separate experiment, simulating field conditions, aerobic conditions were maintained in the subcrustal fill, by perforating column walls. The moisture tension regime and the rate of crust formation were similar to nonperforated columns.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .