My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 21 No. 1, p. 128-134
     
    Received: Feb 5, 1991
    Published: Jan, 1992


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100010019x

Effects of Open-Top Chambers on ‘Valencia’ Orange Trees

  1. D.M. Olszyk ,
  2. B.K. Takemoto,
  3. G. Kats,
  4. P.J. Dawson,
  5. C.L. Morrison,
  6. J. Wolf Preston and
  7. C.R. Thompson
  1. USEPA, Environmental Research Lab., Corvallis, OR 97333
    California Air Resources Board, Research Div., Sacramento, CA 95812
    University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Abstract

Abstract

Open-top field chambers are the most widely used technology for evaluating the impacts of air pollutants on vegetation. This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of chambers on Valencia orange trees (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck). The trees were exposed to ambient ozone (O3) for 51 months in large (4.3-m diam. by 2.9-m high) nonfiltered open-top chambers (NF) and in ambient air without chambers (AA). During this period, the 12-h daytime (M12) average O3 concentration was approximately 8% lower, and the cumulative O3 exposure for hourly average concentrations >0.1 µL L−1 (SUM10) was 29% lower than for NF than for AA trees. By December 1984 (after eight months in chambers), canopy volume for NF trees was 67% greater than for AA trees; and by March 1988 canopy volume for NF trees was 104% greater than for AA trees (P < 0.001). Specific leaf areas (cm2 g−1) were larger for NF than AA trees (P < 0.05). Total harvestable fruit weight combined for years 1986, 1987 and 1988 was 98% higher for NF than for AA trees (P < 0.01). The higher yield for NF trees was associated with lower immature fruit drop, especially during the growing seasons prior to the 1986 and 1987 harvests (P < 0.01). Warm season (April–October) rates of stomatal conductance and transpiration were 14 and 12% lower, respectively, for NF than AA trees; which coincided with 29% more negative leaf water potentials for NF than AA trees (P < 0.05) . In contrast, cool season net photosynthetic rates were 18% lower for NF than for AA trees, and starch concentrations were 31% higher in leaves from NF compared to AA trees in February 1988 (P < 0.05). Overall, the yield increases for NF compared to AA trees could, in part, be accounted for by decreased flux of O3 into leaves (based on decreased O3 exposure and leaf conductance). However, other factors, i.e., increased tree growth, altered leaf C allocation, and lack of wind stress occurring only in chambers, likely contributed to higher NF tree yields.

Research supported in part by the California Air Resources Board under contract no. A2-130-33, A4-134-33 and A733-087. The statements and conclusions are not necessarily those of the U.S. EPA or the California Air Resources Board. This paper has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with materials reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .

Facebook   Twitter