My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 46 No. 6, p. 2486-2491
     
    Received: Apr 30, 2006
    Published: Nov, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): douglas_h_johnson@usgs.gov
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0277

The Many Faces of Replication

  1. Douglas H. Johnson *
  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Dep. of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, 204 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

Replication is one of the three cornerstones of inference from experimental studies, the other two being control and randomization. In fact, replication is essential for the benefits of randomization to apply. In addition to ordinary replication, the repetition of treatments within a study, two other levels of replication have been identified. Pseudoreplication, a termed coined by Stuart Hurlbert, generally involves making multiple measurements on experiment units (which is commendable) and treating them as if they reflected independent responses to treatment (which is erroneous). Metareplication is a higher level of replication in which entire studies are repeated. Scientists are too much concerned about analysis of data within studies and too little concerned about the repeatability of findings from studies conducted under a variety of conditions. Findings that are consistent among studies performed at different locations at different times with different investigators using different methods are likely to be robust and reliable.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America

Facebook   Twitter