My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 46 No. 6, p. 2446-2452
     
    Received: Mar 2, 2006
    Published: Nov, 2006


    * Corresponding author(s): jhc5@cornell.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0144

Alfalfa Fiber Estimation in Mixed Stands and Its Relationship to Plant Morphology

  1. D. Parsons,
  2. J. H. Cherney * and
  3. H. G. Gauch
  1. Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

Abstract

In New York, most alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is grown in mixed stands with grass, and models for estimating neutral detergent fiber (NDF) are not used. The objectives of this experiment were to test the suitability of existing equations for estimating NDF of the alfalfa component of mixed stands, and to better understand how alfalfa is affected by the presence of grass. Stands of first-cut alfalfa and grass (10–90% grass) were sampled at two experimental sites and producers' fields in 19 New York counties during May and June 2004 and 2005. A range of plant measurements and environmental characteristics were recorded. The predictive equations for alfalfa quality (PEAQ) and other models were examined for applicability to mixed stand alfalfa NDF estimation. The R 2 values ranged from 0.80 to 0.87 and RMSE ranged from 20.5 to 25.2 g kg−1 The most biased model was PEAQ, possibly due to the lower cutting height used to generate the PEAQ equation than the cutting height used in this study. For producer fields, a model based on alfalfa height was the best one-variable model, with R 2 of 0.84 and RMSE of 22.7 g kg−1 Presence of grass increases the number of nodes and increases alfalfa height; however, the relationship between alfalfa height and NDF is not changed, suggesting that the predictive ability of models based on alfalfa height is not affected by the percentage of grass in the sward.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2006. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America

Facebook   Twitter