My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 42 No. 6, p. 2049-2054
     
    Received: Jan 10, 2002
    Published: Nov, 2002


    * Corresponding author(s): dredfearn@mail.pss.okstate.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.2049

Cultivar and Environment Effects on Annual Ryegrass Forage Yield, Yield Distribution, and Nutritive Value

  1. Daren D. Redfearn *a,
  2. Brad C. Venutob,
  3. W. D. Pitmanc,
  4. M. W. Alisond and
  5. Jerry D. Wardb
  1. a Oklahoma State Univ., Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Stillwater, OK 74078
    b LSU AgCenter, Southeast Res. Stn., Franklinton, LA 70438
    c LSU AgCenter, Rosepine Res. Stn., Rosepine. LA 70659
    d LSU AgCenter, Macon Ridge Branch, Winnsboro, LA 71295

Abstract

Differences among annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) cultivars for weight gain of grazing steers have been reported, even though plot experiments suggest that forage dry matter yield among cultivars should not be a limiting factor. Likewise, forage nutritive value differences among cultivars have not been assessed. The objectives of this research were to evaluate differences in cumulative forage yield, yield distribution, and nutritive value among ‘Gulf’, ‘Jackson’, ‘Marshall’, ‘Rio’, ‘Rustmaster’, and ‘Surrey’ annual ryegrass. Plots were harvested six times beginning in December at approximate 30-d intervals during the 1997–1998 and 1998–1999 growing seasons. Nutritive value measurements included crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), and digestible NDF (DNDF). There were no differences among cultivars for cumulative forage yield (P = 0.99). However, for the January harvest, Surrey and Gulf averaged 1030 (±65) kg DM ha−1, whereas Marshall yielded only 672 (±79) kg DM ha−1 For the March harvest, yields of all varieties were similar and averaged 1350 (±95) kg DM ha−1 At the May harvest, Marshall and Jackson yielded 1232 (±123) kg DM ha−1, whereas Gulf yielded only 929 (±74) kg DM ha−1 Crude protein concentration differed significantly among harvests with a general decrease from 260 to 120 g CP kg−1 as the growing season progressed. Similar declines in nutritive value occurred for NDF, IVTD, and DNDF. Trends in yield distribution and forage quality may indicate a need for cultivar specific recommendations based on intended forage need and season of use.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2002. Crop Science Society of AmericaPublished in Crop Sci.42:2049–2054.