My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 40 No. 2, p. 370-374
     
    Received: Oct 15, 1998
    Published: Mar, 2000


    * Corresponding author(s): mgiroux@montana.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.402370x

Association of Puroindoline Sequence Type and Grain Hardness in Hard Red Spring Wheat

  1. Michael J. Giroux *a,
  2. Luther Talberta,
  3. Debrah K. Habernichta,
  4. Susan Lanninga,
  5. Amber Hemphilla and
  6. John M. Martina
  1.  aDep. of Plant Sciences, P.O. Box 173150, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3150 USA

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) endosperm texture is a primary determinant of milling and end-product quality. Friabilin, a marker protein for grain hardness, is composed of two proteins, puroindoline a and b (pinA and pinB, respectively). Hard-textured wheats have variant alleles consisting of a glycine-to-serine change in pinB (pinB-D1b) or the complete absence of pinA (pinA-D1b). Our objectives were to examine the influence of pinA and pinB alterations on grain hardness from populations among elite hard red spring wheat cultivars differing in puroindoline alteration, and to measure associations of grain hardness with kernel weight and grain protein concentration. Fifty F3:6 progenies from three pinA-D1b × pinB-D1b, one pinB-D1b × pinB-D1b, and one pinA-D1b × pinA-D1b type crosses were evaluated with their parents in two field experiments. Lines classified as pinA-D1b were significantly harder than lines classified as pinB-D1b when averaged across the three segregating populations. This difference was significant (P < 0.05) in one of the three populations. Significant genetic variation existed for grain hardness, protein concentration, and kernel weight within puroindoline classes and among lines from crosses not segregating for pinA-D1b vs. pinB-D1b Significant positive correlations were observed in all five populations for grain hardness and protein concentration ( r=0.46–0.79 ). Our results indicate that most of the genetic variation in grain hardness among the populations studied was due to factors other than pinA and pinB, as the pinA-D1b vs. pinB-D1b difference explained <12% of the variation in grain hardness in these hard wheat populations.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2000. Crop Science Society of AmericaCrop Science Society of America

Facebook   Twitter