My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 39 No. 2, p. 346-352
     
    Received: Feb 19, 1998
    Published: Mar, 1999


    * Corresponding author(s): etand001@gold.tc.umn.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900020007x

Epistasis for Grain Yield in Two F2 Populations of Maize

  1. J. T. Eta-Ndu  and
  2. S. J. Openshaw
  1. U niv. of Minnesota, 1991 Buford Circle, 411 Borlaug Hall, St. Paul, MN 55108
    P ioneer Hi-Bred Intl. Inc., 7300 NW Ave., P.O. Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131

Abstract

Abstract

The importance of epistasis in breeding populations of maize (Zea mays L.) is not well understood. The objectives of the study were to: (i) test for epistatic effects of genes controlling grain yield, on the basis of testcross data, in the single crosses A679 × Wx6005 and A679 × FR902 and (ii) to investigate the relationship between identified epistasis and testcross yield of the F3, backcrosses of F2 plants to the parental lines, and the cross between the parental lines. A modification of triple test-cross design was used. Each of 52 F2 plants was selfed and simultaneously crossed to the parental lines and the F1 of the cross between the lines. The four F2-derived generations were testcrossed to inbred lines LH85 and LH163. Yield trials of testcrosses were grown at two Minnesota locations for 2 yr in a randomized complete block design with two replications and a split plot restriction on randomizations. Based on testcross means of families derived from individual F2 plants, there was evidence of epistasis for grain yield in both populations. Each tester revealed epistasis in a unique group of F2 individuals and epistasis was nondirectional. Analyses of testcross genotypic variances revealed evidence of epistasis in both populations, but there was no evidence of epistasis based on overall testcross generation means. There was no association between epistasis and testcross yields of F3 and the backcrosses. Our results suggest the presence of nonallelic interaction as well as linkage disequilibrium in both populations.

Contribution from Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Scientific Journal Series no. 97-1-13-0050.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .