My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 29 No. 6, p. 1398-1402
     
    Received: Nov 23, 1988
    Published: Nov, 1989


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060013x

Divergent Phenotypic Recurrent Selection for Nitrate Reductase Activity in Maize. II. Efficient Use of Fertilizer Nitrogen

  1. K. D. Eichelberger,
  2. R. J. Lambert ,
  3. F. E. Below and
  4. R. H. Hageman
  1. Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Abstract

Improving the efficiency of absorption and utilization of soil-applied N by maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars should be an important goal of maize breeders. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between nitrate reductase activity (NRA) and reduced N, N harvest index, N uptake, N utilization, N-use efficiency and grain N accumulation of maize. Eight cycles of divergent phenotypic recurrent selection for high and low levels of postanthesis leaf-lamina NRA were completed in the maize synthetic Super Stiff Stalk (BSSS). Cycles 0, 3, and 6 of the high and low NRA strains were grown at N rates of 112, 224, and 336 kg ha−1 in 1983, 1984, and 1985 at Urbana, IL, and were evaluated for the above N traits. The 1985 experiment included Cycle 8 high and low NRA. Selection for high NRA had little effect on the N traits evaluated. In contrast, selection for low NRA resulted in significant reductions for many of the N traits examined. Reductions in grain N content for Cycle 8 low NRA were 9, 21, and 19% with 112, 224, 336 kg N ha−1, respectively, relative to Cycle 0, were observed. Nitrogen-use efficiency of Cycle 8 low NRA decreased 21, 16, and 13%, relative to Cycle 0, at the three respective N rates. These results indicate selection for low NRA has adversely affected nitrate metabolism in this population, resulting in lower grain N production and less-efficient use of soil-applied N to produce grain.

Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .

Facebook   Twitter