My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in CS

  1. Vol. 23 No. 3, p. 541-546
     
    Received: June 30, 1982
    Published: May, 1983


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030023x

Gas Exchange and Water Relations of ‘Olaf’ Spring Wheat1

  1. Jack A. Morgan and
  2. W. O. Willis2

Abstract

Abstract

Experiments have been performed previously in which one or a small number of microclimate and water relations factors were investigated in relation to their effect on apparent photosynthesis in wheat, but little progress has been made attempting to monitor several of these factors in a single field study of canopy apparent photosynthesis (AP). In the present study, several microclimate and plant variables of field grown wheat plants, subjected to two irrigation regimes, were monitored to observe their combined effect on chamber measurements of AP. Dirunal AP and evapotranspiration (ET) measurements were taken on ‘Olaf’ spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on 5 days from heading through late milk growth stages. Plants were irrigated either weekly (W) or biweekly (BW). A sequential analysis of covariance of the total data set showed AP was significantly associated with flag leaf stomatal resistance and water potential, canopy air temperature, leaf area index (LAI), irradiance, date, and time day. The consistently higher AP rates of treatment W were attributed mostly to higher values of LAI and water potential, and lower stomatal resistances, compared to treatment BW. Although reductions in leaf area and increases in stomatal resistance resulted in less ET for treatment BW, AP was reduced proportionately more by the effects of biweekly irrigation. Thus, water use efficiency was always greater for treatment W. Maximum AP rates alway occurred in the morning and earlier than maximum rates of ET. This observation was attributed partly to warmer afternoon temperatures, which increased ET and, in combination with lowered leaf water potentials, decreased AP. As a result, photosynthetic capacity was always greater in the morning than the afternoon. However, time of day still affected AP significantly after accounting for all of the variability associated with these and other measured variables which were known to affect AP. Based on measurements taken for both treatments, stomata appeared to be generally more open after than before anthesis. On the final day of measurements, stomata of treatment BW were closing, apparently in response to leaf aging.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .