My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 97 No. 1, p. 322-332
     
    Received: Mar 26, 2004
    Published: Jan, 2005


    * Corresponding author(s): snapp@msu.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0322

Evaluating Cover Crops for Benefits, Costs and Performance within Cropping System Niches

  1. S. S. Snapp *a,
  2. S. M. Swintonb,
  3. R. Labartab,
  4. D. Mutchc,
  5. J. R. Blackb,
  6. R. Leepa,
  7. J. Nyiranezaa and
  8. K. O'Neila
  1. a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
    b Dep. of Agric. Economics, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
    c W.K. Kellogg Biological Stn., Michigan State Univ. Ext., Land and Water Program, Hickory Corners, MI 49060

Abstract

The integration of cover crops into cropping systems brings costs and benefits, both internal and external to the farm. Benefits include promoting pest-suppression, soil and water quality, nutrient cycling efficiency, and cash crop productivity. Costs of adopting cover crops include increased direct costs, potentially reduced income if cover crops interfere with other attractive crops, slow soil warming, difficulties in predicting N mineralization, and production expenses. Cover crop benefits tend to be higher in irrigated systems. The literature is reviewed here along with Michigan farmer experience to evaluate promising cover crop species for four niches: Northern winter (USDA Hardiness Zones 5–6), Northern summer (Zones 5–6), Southern winter (Zones 7–8), and Southern summer (Zones 7–8). Warm season C4 grasses are outstanding performers for summer niches (6–9 Mg ha−1), and rye (Secale cereale L.) is the most promising for winter niches (0.8–6 Mg ha−1) across all hardiness zones reviewed. Legume–cereal mixtures such as sudangrass (Sorghum sudanese L.)–cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) are the most effective means to produce substantial amounts (28 Mg ha−1) of mixed quality residues. Legume covers are slow growers and expensive to establish. At the same time, legumes fix N, produce high quality but limited amounts (0.5–4 Mg ha−1) of residues, and enhance beneficial insect habitat. Brassica species produce glucosinolate-containing residues (2–6 Mg ha−1) and suppress plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne disease. Legume cover crops are the most reliable means to enhance cash crop yields compared with fallows or other cover crop species. However, farmer goals and circumstances must be considered. If soil pests are a major yield limiting factor in cash crop production, then use of brassica cover crops should be considered. Cereal cover crops produce the largest amount of biomass and should be considered when the goal is to rapidly build soil organic matter. Legume–cereal or brassica–cereal mixtures show promise over a wide range of niches.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2005. American Society of AgronomyAmerican Society of Agronomy