My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 93 No. 4, p. 891-895
     
    Received: Apr 10, 2000
    Published: July, 2001


    * Corresponding author(s): heather.loeppky@gov.ab.ca
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2134/agronj2001.934891x

Residue Removal and Nitrogen Fertilization Affects Tiller Development and Flowering in Meadow Bromegrass

  1. Heather A. Loeppky * and
  2. Bruce E. Coulman
  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0X2 Canada

Abstract

Flowering and seed yield in many temperate grasses are dependent on floral induction in the previous fall. Field experiments were conducted in Saskatchewan to determine the effect of crop residue removal and N fertilization on tiller and panicle development in meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm.). Four residue removal treatments (none, after harvest, October, and after harvest + October) and three N treatments (0, 50, and 100 kg N ha−1) were applied in each of 2 yr. Tiller density and leaf stage were determined in fall and spring; panicle density was determined just before seed harvest each year. Removing crop residue generally increased tiller and panicle density. However, fall tiller density decreased at Saskatoon in 1996 due to dry conditions, regardless of residue removal. Because fewer tillers were present in the fall when conditions that promote flowering prevailed, panicle density was reduced by 62% compared with the previous year. Nitrogen generally did not affect tiller density or development. However, in the spring of 1996, 100 kg N ha−1 with a single residue removal increased leaf stage from 2.4 to 2.6 leaves tiller−1 This rate of N with double residue removal reduced leaf stage to 2.2 leaves tiller−1 due to winter injury. Fall tiller density and panicle production were similarly affected. As a result of winter injury and drought, fall tiller density and development were not highly or frequently correlated with panicle or seed production. Hence, fall tiller density and development in the prior year cannot be used as a tool to predict seed yield.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2001. American Society of AgronomyPublished in Agron. J.93:891–895.

Facebook   Twitter