My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 93 No. 3, p. 517-523
     
    Received: Jan 28, 1999
    Published: May, 2001


    * Corresponding author(s): ssharmas@csufresno.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2001.933517x

Agroeconomic Analyses of Drip Irrigation for Sugarbeet Production

  1. Florence Cassel Sharmasarkara,
  2. Shankar Sharmasarkar *a,
  3. Larry J. Heldc,
  4. Stephen D. Millera,
  5. George F. Vanceb and
  6. Renduo Zhangb
  1. a Dep. of Plant Sci., College of Agric., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3354
    c Dep. of Agric. and Applied Econ., College of Agric., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3354
    b Dep. of Renewable Resources, College of Agric., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3354

Abstract

Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a major cash crop in Wyoming where overuse of water and agrochemicals is a concern in furrow-irrigated areas. Drip irrigation, an alternative technology, is not well developed for row crops within the state. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the economic feasibility of implementing drip irrigation practice for sugarbeet production. Capital budgeting analyses, including net present value (NPV) and rate of return (ROR), were used for 10 to 40 ha. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with drip system size and life span, interest rate, water price, and weed control cost. Sugarbeet and sugar yields were higher under drip irrigation than furrow irrigation at P = 0.05. The drip system investment cost decreased with increasing size. Total variable costs for drip irrigation were lower than those for furrow irrigation. Sugarbeet returns were $2080 and $2310 ha−1 for furrow and drip irrigation practices, respectively. Higher returns and shorter payback time were observed for large conversion areas. The sensitivity was more pronounced with small-scale farming. Increasing interest rates caused delays in positive return and profit and contributed to larger differences in payback time between drip system sizes. For all conversion sizes, ROR increased with system lifetime. Higher profitability was observed for areas with increased water prices and weed control costs. The overall findings indicated that sugarbeet production under drip irrigation would be most profitable for a 40-ha area with payback periods ranging from 7 to 10 yr.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2001. American Society of AgronomyPublished in Agron. J.93:517–523.