My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 86 No. 4, p. 725-730
     
    Received: May 14, 1993
    Published: July, 1994


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040026x

Effectiveness and Economics of Dryland Conservation Tillage Systems in the Southern Great Plains

  1. A. F. Wiese ,
  2. W. L. Harman,
  3. B. W. Bean and
  4. C. D. Salisbury
  1. Texas A&M Univ. Res. and Ext. Ctr., 6500 Amarillo Blvd. West, Amarillo, TX 79106

Abstract

Abstract

Precipitation is limited in the Southern Great Plains, and farmers must minimize production costs and control erosion. The purpose of this research was to determine economic feasibility of dryland no- and reduced-tillage systems compared with sweep plowing on Pullman clay loam soil (fine, mixed, mesic Torrertic Paleustoli) in continuous winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell) and in a winter wheat-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-fallow rotation with two crops produced in 3 yr. Economic analyses considered 4-yr averages of income and treatment costs. In continuous winter wheat, sweep plowing yielded significantly less (425 kg ha−l) than the best no-tillage treatment in 2 of 4 yr. Because of low variable costs, sweeping was most profitable in the short-term, and when machinery depreciation was considered for the long-term, sweep tillage followed by glyphosate lost the least money. In the fallow period between sorghum and wheat, sweep plowing yielded significantly less than the best no-tillage 2 of 4 yr or an average of 275 kg ha−1. However, because of low variable costs, sweep plowing was the most profitable in the short run, $84 ha−1, but $3 ha−1 less profitable in the long run than sweep plowing followed by glyphosate. In the wheat-sorghum part of the rotation, using paraquat or glyphosate alone resulted in lowest yields because of poor weed control. Sweep plowing yielded less than the best no-tillage 1 of 4 yr, but lower costs made it the most profitable, both short and long term.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .