My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 83 No. 3, p. 559-564
     
    Received: Apr 18, 1990
    Published: May, 1991


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300030008x

Yield and Quality of Forage Maize as Influenced by Hybrid, Planting Date, and Plant Density

  1. J. S. Graybill,
  2. W. J. Cox  and
  3. D. J. Otis
  1. Dept. of Soil, Crop, and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

Abstract

Abstract

Although forage maize (Zea mays L.) is grown extensively on livestock operations, most management studies in the USA focus on grain production. Field studies were conducted in New York to evaluate dry matter (DM) yield and forage quality responses of commercial hybrids to planting dates and densities. Six hybrids were planted on 25 April, 9 May, and 23 May and thinned to 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0 plants m−2 in 1988 and 1989. A significant year ✕ planting date interaction was observed for DM yield because dry early-season conditions in 1988 negated the advantage of early planting in northern latitudes (13.4, 13.9, and 14.6 Mg ha−1 for planting dates 25 April, 9 May, and 23 May, respectively). When averaged across years, high plant densities increased DM yields (15.7,16.5, and 17.5 Mg ha−1 at 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0 plants m−2, respectively) with no significant effect on harvest index (524,523, and 526 g kg−1 at 5.0,6.5, and 8.0 plants m−2, respectively). A hybrid ✕ density interaction was observed for DM yield that suggests that some hybrids in this study performed better at higher densities. Plant density had little effect on acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations indicating that forage quality can be maintained at high densities. Hybrids showed distinct variation for ADF (186-217 g kg−1), NDF (414-434 g kg−1), and crude protein (CP) (72-77 g kg−1) concentrations. The forage quality differences among hybrids may be of sufficient magnitude to be of value to the forage producer.

Research supported in part through Hatch Project, 125-6427, USDA, Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., and Agway, Inc.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .