My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 80 No. 1, p. 102-108
     
    Received: Feb 19, 1987
    Published: Jan, 1988


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions

doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000010023x

Recovery of Anhydrous Ammonia-Derived Nitrogen-15 During Three Years of Corn Production in Iowa

  1. C. A. Sanchez and
  2. A. M. Blackmer 
  1. E verglades Res. and Educ. Ctr., Belle Glade, FL 33430
    D ep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

Abstract

Abstract

Studies were conducted at two locations to determine recovery of anhydrous ammonia-derived I5N applied with and without nitrapyrin [2-ehloro-6-(trichloromethyI) pyridine] during corn (Zea mays L.) production over a 3-yr period in which N fertilizers were applied annually at rates commonly used in the Corn Belt. The results showed that 13 to 33% of the labeled N was removed from the plots during grain harvest in the first crop after application. Recovery of labeled N in the whole plants ranged from 29 to 45%, but the stover was returned to the plots. Nitrapyrin increased the amount of N recovered in plant tissue at only one of the six site years studied. Only small percentages (0.3-1.5%) of the labeled N were recovered in the second and third crops after application, and nitrapyrin had negligible effects on amounts of labeled N recovered by these crops. Analysis of soil samples collected 1 yr after application of labeled N showed that 19 to 23% of this N remained in the soil. Only small portions of this N existed as exchangeable ammonium and nitrate. Most of this N was in the KMI-N (Kjeldahl minus inorganic-N) fraction, which includes N from both organic matter and nonexchangeable ammonium. Large portions (47-94% of the labeled N found in the KMI-N fraction 1 yr after application were still present 3 yr after application. The results of this study show that a substantial portion (49-64% of the labeled N was lost from the surface 1.5 m of soil during the first year by processes other than plant uptake. A probable explanation as to why the losses reported here are greater than those reported from many comparable studies is that our determinations included the amounts of fertilizer N lost during the fall-tospring period. These losses must be considered when evaluating the long-term efficiency of N fertilization practices and the effects of these practices on environmental quality.

Journal Paper no. J-12575 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames. Project 2741. This work was supported in part by a grant from Dow Chemical USA.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .

Facebook   Twitter