My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 76 No. 3, p. 454-456
     
    Received: May 31, 1983
    Published: May, 1984


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030020x

Drying Rates of Spring Triticale Compared to Wheat1

  1. John M. Clarke and
  2. T. Fred Townley-Smith2

Abstract

Abstract

Some workers have observed that triticale (X-Triticosecale Wittmack) is slower to dry down after maturity than is wheat (Triticum spp.). Laboratory water uptake rate studies were undertaken with threshed seed of triticale lines in an effort to identify lines with potentially differing drying rates. Drying rates of four lines and one cultivar of triticale were compared with those of two hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum L.) and one tetraploid wheat (T. turgidum var. durum L.) in windrowed and standing treatments in the field. The experiment was conducted in Saskatchewan, Canada on an Orthic Brown Chernozem; Aridic Boroll soil. Over 2 years, the triticales dried as quickly as, or in some cases, more quickly than the wheats. Similar results were obtained when the rates of kernel water loss after physiological maturity for standing wheat and triticale were compared over 4 years. The triticales tended to reach physiological maturity at higher kernel water concentrations than Glenlea wheat, which may have contributed to the faster drying rates of the triticales.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .