My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 69 No. 2, p. 278-282
     
    Received: June 5, 1976
    Published: Mar, 1977


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900020019x

Fall- vs. Spring-applied Sulfur-coated Urea, Uncoated Urea, and Sodium Nitrate for Corn1

  1. W. W. Frye2

Abstract

Abstract

The practice of applying fertilizer in the fall for crops grown the next summer is advantageous to the fertilizer manufacturing and marketing sector as well as saving time for farmers in the spring planting season. Sulfur-coated urea (SCU), NaNO3, and uncoated urea were applied in field experiments during 1972-74 to compare their efficiency in fall application with spring application for the production of corn (Zea mays L.) grain on a Mountview silt loam soil (Typic Paleudult, fine silty, siliceous, thermic) at Cookeville, Tenn. Two dissolution grades of SCU were compared with NaNO3 and uncoated urea, at rates of 112 and 224 kg N/ha in 1972–73 and 168 and 224 kg N/ha in 1974. Grain yields were measured and relative efficiency of fall application and response to rates, sources, and dates of application were calculated. Soil concentrations of ammonium and nitrate N were measured on some treatments. Soil temperature at 10 cm depth was recorded during the winter and early spring of 2 years.

There were little or no differences in corn grain yields between fall and spring applications of N at the 224 kg/ha rate. At the lower N rates, spring-applied N increased yields compared to fall-applied N. The relative efficiency of fall compared to spring application of the materials, averaged for 3 years, was 0.52 and 0.86 for NaNO3 at 112 and 224 kg N/ha respectively, 0.49 and 0-95 for uncoated urea, 0.80 and 1.10 for SCU-1, and 0.72 and 1.03 for SCU-2. Nitrates leached to a depth of 45 cm or more during the winter and early spring in plots treated with NaNO3 and uncoated urea. Conditions were probably favorable for a slow but significant dentrification rate at times during the winter and early spring, leading to the belief that dentrification may have caused some of the decreased efficiency of fall-applied N.

Although SCU was more effective than NaNO3 or uncoated urea, fall-applied N from any fertilizer source would be less effective on subsequent spring and summer growth than spring-applied N under similar soil and climate conditions.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .