My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 61 No. 4, p. 587-589
     
    Received: Dec 19, 1968
    Published: July, 1969


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100040032x

In Vivo Nylon Bag vs. Two-Stage In Vitro Digestion: Comparison of Two Techniques for Estimating Dry-Matter Digestibility of Forages1

  1. W. G. Manson,
  2. R. S. Lowrey and
  3. Ian Forbes2

Abstract

Abstract

In vivo nylon bag and two-stage in vitro, digestion techniques were used to estimate dry-matter digestibility of 159 forage samples involving Coastal hermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.), Pensacola bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Stapf and C.E. Hubb.), blue lupine (Lupinus angustifolius L.), Desmodium uncinatum, and Dolichos lablab L. A highly significant correlation (r = .81, P < .01) was obtained between the two methods with all forages. The stem component of the pearl millet sampies gave the lowest correlation between methods. Either method, when properly used, can be of valuable assistance in evaluating the quality of large numbers of forage samples.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .