My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 60 No. 6, p. 669-672
     
    Received: Apr 22, 1968
    Published: Nov, 1968


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000060026x

Comparison of Growth Stages of Sorghum Forage Types as to Yield and Chemical Composition

  1. George F. Worker and
  2. Vern L. Marble2

Abstract

Abstract

A 2-year study of harvesting three types of forage sorghum — sudangrass, sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, and sorgo — at pasture, boot, flower, and soft-dough stages was undertaken to evaluate dry-matter production, chemical composition, and digestibility predicted from chemical analyses.

Dry-matter yields generally increased in all types as harvest was delayed, with sorgo making the largest increase at the soft-dough stage.

Percent ash, crude protein, and fat decreased as harvest was delayed with little difference occurring between forage types. All cultivars declined in fiber when harvested after the flower stage. Total sugar percent increased as harvest was delayed for all forage types.

Sudangrass and sorghum-sudangrass TDN percent was lowest when cut at flower stage of maturity, whereas the sorgo steadily increased from the earliest harvest to the latest.

Forage quality, except for crude protein which decreased sharply as harvest was delayed, was approximately equal for all forage types. Dry-matter production varied considerably by forage types and stage of harvest indicating the utilization of sudangrass for pasture or green chop; sorghum-sudangrass hybrid for pasture, green chop, or silage; and sorgo for silage.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © .