My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 100 No. Supplement_3, p. S-79-S-88
     
    Received: Oct 13, 2006
    Published: May, 2008


    * Corresponding author(s): degli@uky.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0286c

Comparison of Corn and Soybean Yields in the United States: Historical Trends and Future Prospects

  1. D. B. Egli *
  1. Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Kentucky, 427 Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Dr., Lexington, KY 40546-0312. Published with the approval of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn. as Paper 06-06-133

Abstract

Developing successful strategies to ensure future increases in crop yield depends, in part, on a better understanding of the basis for past increases. To this end, I compared historical yield trends of two dissimilar crops—corn (Zea mays L.), a high yielding C4 grass, and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], a moderate yielding C3 legume—in high (Iowa, Illinois, Indiana) and low (Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee) yield environments. Average state corn yield changed very little from 1866 to 1930, an era of low-input agriculture, but it increased rapidly from 1950 to 2005 in all states as the low-input system gave way to a high-input system that utilized commercial hybrids, manufactured N fertilizer, herbicides, and higher plant populations. Soybean yield, first available in 1924, increased steadily from the beginning until 2005. Corn yield increased faster than soybean yield in the early decades of the high-input era (mean growth rates of corn were 3.3 vs. 1.5% per year for soybean with a slight advantage for both crops in high yield states) in all six states, but for the rest of the era (up to 40 yr), corn and soybean yields grew at nearly the same rate (1.8% per year for corn, 1.4% per year for soybean with a slight advantage for the low-yield states). Thus, the efforts to improve the plant (plant breeding) and production environment (better management practices) had essentially the same affect on these two very dissimilar crops.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy