My Account: Log In | Join | Renew
Search
Author
Title
Vol.
Issue
Year
1st Page

Abstract

 

This article in AJ

  1. Vol. 100 No. 3, p. 830-836
     
    Received: June 19, 2007
    Published: May, 2008


    * Corresponding author(s): pingping.jiang@ucr.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0216

Estimating Plant-Available Water Using the Simple Inverse Yield Model for Claypan Landscapes

  1. Pingping Jiang *a,
  2. Newell R. Kitchenb,
  3. Stephen H. Andersonc,
  4. E. John Sadlerb and
  5. Kenneth A. Sudduthb
  1. a Dep. of Environmental Sci., 2323 Geology Bldg., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
    b 269 Agric. Eng. Bldg., USDA-ARS, Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211
    c 302 ABNR Bldg., Dep. of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sci., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

Abstract

Plant-available water (PAW) is one of the fundamental soil factors affecting crop yield, yet quantitative determination of plant-available water capacity (PAWc) at a field scale has been challenging. A simple inverse yield model (SIYM) has been devised and shown to be successful in estimating PAWc at a field scale for well-drained soils by matching simulated corn (Zea mays L.) yield with measured yield. For other soils, however, SIYM is yet to be tested. Our objective was to evaluate SIYM performance in estimating PAWc for poorly-drained claypan-soil landscapes. Soil PAWc to a depth of 1.2 m (PAW1.2) was measured at 19 and 18 sampling locations for two claypan-soil fields, Fields 1 and 2, respectively. Corn yield maps of the two fields (nine site-years between 1993 and 2003) were used with the model to estimate PAWc Yield reduction associated with low precipitation and high vapor-pressure deficit during corn reproductive stages, and large yield variation in dry years were indications available water was the main yield-limiting factor. The regression r 2 values between SIYM-estimated PAWc and the measured PAW1.2 were 0.43 for Field 1 and 0.31 for Field 2 with estimating errors of 18 and 50 mm, respectively. In Field 2, SIYM estimated markedly lower PAWc compared with the PAW1.2 at the most-eroded backslope areas, where claypan characteristics were most prevalent. The SIYM-PAWc estimates would be more informative in assessing soil productivity because they are based on crop-water relations and not solely on soil texture.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2008. American Society of AgronomyCopyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy